Human resources case study Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 1000 words

Human resources - Case Study Example This method does not require that all these sources be included but the more they are the better. Certainly, there are no known legal limits to the sources of rating that may be invoked in the evaluation of performance. Research indicates that the multiple-input approach has more accuracy and reliability in the final information provided (Bracken et al, 15). Top generate proper feedback it is necessary to ensure that the organisations culture and mission are considered since the purpose of feedback will differ with each sources. The Centre for Persons with Disabilities has a reputation of being an objective and goal oriented institution whose mission is to improve the lives of persons with disabilities as wells the affected families. The institution invests in research, education and training, demonstration services as well as technical assistance. The information gathered from the research is used as a platform for the diagnosis accommodation correction of the various body challenges. It also allows the families to leant new methods and ways of accommodations the affected persons challenge into their daily lives. The education and training aspect ensures that the service providers and families are equipped with techniques of dealing and managing the conditions. Any employee’s evaluation will therefore have to fall in line with the mentioned objectives of the institution to pass for good performance. Julie Williams works at The Centre for Persons with Disabilities as a clerk in the Interdisciplinary Training Division, and she helps children with disabilities to improve their learning process, and will collect data by conducting over the phone surveys, mailing out surveys, possibly emailing surveys. The phone surveys will allow the evaluation to have an interpersonal perspective with the various sources. It allows the evaluation to take into consideration the feeling of

Project management coarse work Essay Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 1250 words

Project management coarse work - Essay Example One such result is the Denver International Airport Baggage Handling Project. In order to highlight on the high regard placed on project management, it is imperative to cite an example of such catastrophic failure, which accrued from poor project management. The Denver International Airport is currently ranked as among the five busiest airports in the world. The baggage handling system had a budget allowance of five hundred and sixty million. As such, it is of magnitude that will best depict the importance of this art if indeed project management can be regarded as such. This paper will explicate on the exact failures of the project management team while simultaneously endeavoring to relay alternative courses of action that would have yielded the desired results, if not better. Analysis Few failed projects can rival the extent to which the Denver International Airport baggage handling system cost the American tax payer. Given this significant impact, it is not startling that there ex ists numerous data to be sourced from the web expounding on the project. It is on this rationale that the internet fashioned a core data source for this paper. However, these sources might conflict on trivial details, what they do agree on is the insurmountable figures that characterized the baggage handling system. ... The baggage handling system was to cut delays by tremendous figures while simultaneously slashing aircraft turn around to as little as thirty minutes. On paper, it was the perfect project on which the new airport could embark. However, the dissimilarity between how the project appears on paper and in the actual senses all depends on the efficacy of the project management team (Lock, 2007). The resultant system, which was put in place, was a mere shadow of the project that had been envisioned. It neither had the glamour nor the efficiency of the proposed system. The Denver International Airport baggage handling system best exemplifies dysfunctional decision making. A series of these flawed decisions transformed a remarkably brilliant undertaking into a laughable ghost of the original project. The question now becomes who is responsible for this failure. A number of key errors were made along the way but, the bulk of the blame ought to lie with the project management team (Project Mana gement Institute, 2008). This stems from the fact that, it was their mandated task to guarantee a smooth and definite transition of the project from paper into real life. Project managers should first seek to understand the nature of their projects before they embark on them. This is in relation to the respective complexity, schedule, scope and the allocated budget. After gaining this vital understanding, they should then endeavor to make decisions with these facts in mind. An oversight that was made is that; the complexities that were to accompany the project were not well understood and subsequently handled. Thus, when in the advanced stages of the project, when such complexities arose the team was not well positioned to react accordingly. The implementation of the